Drugs
and Pharmaceuticals
Current
R & D Highlights
(RNA
and Drug Discovery)
Contents
Introduction
· RNA and Drug Discovery 1
Features
· RNA Therapeutics: Silencing the Culprit 7
News & Views 14
R&D Highlights
· MicroRNAs in Diseases and Drug
Response 19
· Alternative Splicing and Disease 22
R& D Technology 48
New Leads 56
Biotechnology
· RNA Interference: The Story of
Gene Silencing in Plants and Humans 61
Patents 67
Ribonucleic acid (RNA) a macromolecule present in all the
living cells, transporter of genetic information from DNA to protein that
determines the structure and function of the cell, catalyzes chemical reactions
and can alter the expression of proteins which may lead to various diseases.
Living cells store their hereditary information in the form of
double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) molecules. The DNA in genomes does
not direct protein synthesis itself but instead uses RNA as intermediary
molecules when the particular cell needs a specific protein. Nucleotide
sequence of the appropriate portion of the immensely long DNA molecule in a
chromosome is first copied into m-RNA a process called transcription. The
copies of m-RNA segments of the DNA are used directly as templates to direct
the synthesis of the protein in a
process called translation.
The flow of genetic information in cells is therefore from DNA
to RNA to protein. All cells from bacteria to humans, express their genetic
information in this way – a principal so fundamental that it is termed as the “Central
Dogma” of molecular biology. The process of regulation of gene expression is –
that how cells “know” to make the right proteins at the right time in right
amounts is the major focus of current research in molecular biology.
Despite the universality of the “Central Dogma”, there are
important variations in the way information flows from DNA to protein.
Principal among these is that RNA transcripts (pre m-RNA) in eukaryotic cells
are subject to a series of processing steps in the nucleus before the formation
of mature m-RNA, which serves as template for protein synthesis.
The protein coding sequences in the eukaryotic genes are
typically interrupted by non-coding intervening sequences, discovered in 1977. This
feature of eukaryotic genes came as a surprise to scientists who had been until
that time, familiar only with bacterial genes, typically consisting of
continuous stretches of coding DNA that is directly transcribed into m-RNA. In
humans and other complex metazoans, the vast majority of protein-coding genes
contain many segments (introns) that are part of the primary transcript (pre
m-RNA) but are not included in mature m-RNA. The removal of introns and joining
together of the sequences (exons) included in the final mature m-RNA is
accomplished by pre-m-RNA splicing.
The identification of exons and the execution of splicing
reaction is mediated by the spliceosomes, a molecular complex composed of five snRNP
(small nuclear RNA proteins), and a range of non-snRNP associated protein
factors.
Alternative splicing is a process by which the exons of the pre-m-RNA
transcripts produced by transcription of a gene are reconnected in multiple
ways. The resulting m-RNAs may be translated into different protein isoforms;
thus, a single gene may code for multiple proteins. Alternative splicing occurs
as a normal phenomenon in eukaryotes, where it greatly increases the diversity
of proteins that can be encoded by the genome. In humans, over 80% of genes are
alternatively spliced. There are numerous modes of alternative splicing
observed, of which the most common is exon skipping. In this mode, a particular
exon may be included in m-RNAs under some conditions or in particular tissues,
and omitted from the m-RNA in others.
The splicing of pre-m-RNA to m-RNA is a critical step in the expression
of the majority of mammalian genes. Spliceosome, catalyzes the excision of
intervening intron sequences and joining of the exon sequences. A typical human
and mouse gene contains eight to ten exons, which can be joined in different
arrangements by alternative splicing (AS). Recent computational studies have
estimated that one- to two-thirds of human and mouse genes contain at least one
alternative exon. It is widely assumed that AS is a key step in the generation
of proteomic diversity in more complex organisms. AS can increase the coding
capacity of the genome without increasing the number of genes.
Alternative splicing is known to play numerous critical roles
in regulatory pathways in metazoans, including those controlling cell growth,
cell death, differentiation and development, and its mis-regulation has been
implicated in many life-threatening human diseases. Many human gene mutations
affect the splicing pattern of that gene. For example, a mutation in the
sequence at an intron/exon junction that is recognized by the spliceosomes can
cause this junction to be ignored. This causes splicing to occur to the next
exon in line, leaving out the exon next to the mutation. This exon skipping
usually results in an m-RNA that codes for a non-functional protein. Exon
skipping and other errors in splicing are seen in many human genetic diseases
(Table 1).
Mutations that disrupt any of the components of RNPs, either
RNA or proteins or the factors required for their assembly can be deleterious
to cells and cause disease. To identify physiologically and diseases-relevant
AS events and to determine where and when these occur, what their specific
roles are, and how they are regulated is a priority research area.
In this post-genomic era of biological
sciences, it is more imperative than ever to utilize human DNA sequencing data
in the process of drug design, which starts with target identification and
validation. For decades, the pharmaceutical industry has been designing small
molecules, peptides, and antibodies to inhibit clinically-relevant, human
protein targets, many of which were identified and validated in the pre-genomic
era. However, for a multitude of reasons, many clinically-relevant, human
proteins are not druggable. Drug researchers continue to search for novel
therapeutic modalities that can inhibit with greater potency, efficacy, and can
be developed in less time and more cost-effectively. The most recent mission
has been to target non-protein biomolecules—the most common of which is
RNA—with inhibitory nucleic acids. However, this attempt is not a new one. The
use of antisense nucleic acids to inhibit protein translation from
complementary, clinically-relevant RNA in human cells has been in existence for
many years. Other therapeutic modalities in this category include aptamers,
ribozymes, and RNAi (a small inhibitory RNA molecule, or siRNA).
There are a number of scientific and
economical reasons for this trend shift in target identification. RNA offers a
unique way to get at many drug targets that are currently un-druggable, but are
very well validated. Some of therapeutic
approaches that use or target RNAs are –
·
Antisense RNA
·
RNA interference
·
Small Molecules
·
RNA Aptamers
·
micro-RNAs
Antisense RNA
Antisense therapy is a form of treatment for genetic disorders
or infections. When the genetic sequence of a particular gene is known to be
causative of a particular disease, it is possible to synthesize a strand of
nucleic acid (DNA, RNA or a chemical analogue) that will bind to the messenger
RNA (m-RNA) produced by that gene and inactivate it, effectively turning that
gene "off". This is because m-RNA has to be single stranded for it to
be translated. Alternatively, the strand might be targeted to bind a splicing
site on pre-m-RNA and modify the exon content of an m-RNA.
Table 1: The
Affects of Alternative Splicing on Disease
|
Disorder |
Gene |
Missense |
Nonsense |
Translationally Silent |
|
Acute
intermittent porphyria |
Porphobilinogen
deaminase |
|
|
R28R(C→G, 3) |
|
Breast
and ovarian cancer |
BRCA1 |
|
E139K (G→T,18) |
|
|
Carbohydrate-deficient
glycoprotein type 1a |
PMM2 |
|
E139K (G→A,5) |
|
|
Cerbotendinous
xanthomatosis |
Sterol-27-hydroxylase |
|
E60X (G→T,3); |
G112G (G→T,
2) |
|
Cystic
fibrosis |
CFTR |
|
R75X
(C→T,3); R553X
(C→T,11); W1228X(G→A,20); |
|
|
Ehlers-danlos
syndrome type V1 |
Lysyl
hydroxylase |
|
Y511X
(C→A,14); |
|
|
Fanconi
anemia |
FANCG |
|
Q356X
(C→T,8) |
|
|
Frontotemporal
dementia (FTDP-17) |
Tau |
S305N(G→A,
10) N297K
(T→G,10) |
|
L284L (T→C10) S305S
(T→C10) |
|
Hemophilia
A |
Factor
VIII |
|
E1978X
(G→T,19) R2116X(C→T,22) |
|
|
HPRT
deficiency |
Hypoxanthine
phosphoribosyl transferase |
G40V(G→T,2) R48H(G→A,3) A161E
(C→A,6) P184L(C→T,8) D194Y(G→T,8) E197K(G→A,8) E197V(A→T,8) |
|
|
|
Leigh’s
encephalomyelopathy |
Pyuvate
dehydrogenase E1α |
|
|
G185G(A→G,6) |
|
Marfan
syndrome |
Fibrilin-1 |
|
|
121181(C→T,51) |
|
Metachromatic
leukodystrophy(juvenile form) |
Arylsulfatase
A |
T4091
(C→T,8) |
|
|
|
Neurofibromatosis type 1 |
NF1 |
|
R304X(C→T,7) Q756X(C→T,14) Y2264X(C→A,37) |
|
|
OCT
deficiency |
Ornithine
carbamoyltransferase |
|
L304F(G→T,9) |
|
|
Porphyria
cutanea tarda |
Uroporphyrinogen
decarboxylase |
|
|
E314E(G
→ A,9) |
|
Sandhoff
disease |
Hexosaminidase |
P404L(C
→ T,11) |
|
|
|
Severe
combined immunodeficiency |
Adenosine
deaminase |
R142Q(G
→ A,5) |
R142X(C
→ T,5) |
|
|
Spinal
muscle atrophy |
SMN1 |
|
W102X(G →A,3) |
|
|
Spinal
muscle atrophy |
SMN2 |
|
|
F280F(C→T,7) |
|
Tyrosinemia
type1 |
Fumaryl
acetoacetate hydrolase |
Q279R(A→G,8) |
|
N232N(C→T,8) |
(Trends in Genetics, Vol.18,
No. 4, April 2002, p.186)
This synthesized nucleic acid is termed an
"anti-sense" oligonucleotide because its base sequence is
complementary to the gene's messenger RNA (m-RNA), which is called the
"sense" sequence.
Antisense drugs are being researched to treat cancers
(including lung cancer, colorectal carcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma, malignant
glioma and malignant melanoma), diabetes, ALS, Duchenne muscular dystrophy and
diseases such as asthma and arthritis with an inflammatory component. Most
potential therapies have not yet produced significant clinical results, though
one antisense drug, fomivirsen, has been approved by the US FDA as a treatment
for Cytomegalovirus retinitis.
RNA Interference
The capacity to selectively eliminate an m-RNA of a disease
causing allele or to prevent translation of a deleterious protein by
RNAi (RNA Interference) presents
a wide range of targets for therapeutic modulation. RNAi relies on the base
pairing interaction of 21-23 nucleotide RNAs, a size sufficient to uniquely
target an m-RNA or even a specific splice variant, and provides a versatile and
potent tool. RNAi-based strategies are applicable to all diseases in which
decreasing expression of an RNA, whether from a mutant allele or an aberrantly
expressed m-RNA, would have therapeutic effects. Great progress has been made
toward translating the expertise of RNAi from an extensively used experimental
tool to an effective and safe treatment. The main challenges again are optimal
delivery to the appropriate tissues and cells, avoiding the cellular antiviral
response to double-stranded RNA, and achieving the optimal balance of high potency
without off-target effects.
Table2: Selected
RNA-based Therapies in Development
|
Company |
Programme |
Indication |
Status |
|
Antisense |
|
|
|
|
|
ISIS301012 |
High cholesterol |
Phase II |
|
|
|
Diabetes |
Phase II |
|
OncoGenex, Isis |
OGX-011 |
Cancer |
Phase II |
|
Eli Lilly, Isis |
LY 2181308 |
Cancer |
Phase II |
|
AVI BioPharma |
Resten |
Restenosis |
Phase II |
|
|
AVI-5126 |
CABG |
Phase I/II |
|
|
AVI-4065 |
Hepatitis C |
Phase II |
|
Topigen |
TPI-ASM8 |
Asthma |
Phase I |
|
Lorus Therapeutics |
GTI-2040 |
Renal cell carcinoma |
Phase II |
|
Aptamer |
|
|
|
|
Archemix |
ARC1779 |
Acute coronary
syndrome,percutaneous coronary intervention |
Phase I |
|
Antisoma,Archemix |
AS 1411 |
Renal cancer, acute
myeloid leukaemia |
Phase II |
|
Small-interfering RNA |
|
|
|
|
Opko Health |
Bevasiranib (C and 5) |
Wet AMD |
Phase III |
|
Allergen |
AGN 211745 (Sirna-027) |
Wet AMD |
Phase II |
|
Silence Therapeutics,
Quark Biotech, Pfizer |
RTP 801i |
Wet AMD |
Phase I |
|
Alnylam |
ALN-RSV01 |
RSV infections |
Phase II |
RSV=respiratory syncytal
virus; AMD= age related macular degeneration
(Nature Reviews: Drug Discovery, Vol.6, Nov., 2007,p.
863)
RNA as Target for Small Molecules
Alternative splicing is an attractive target for
pharmacological intervention with small molecules. AS splicing of most of the
introns is strongly dependent an serine-argenine rich (SR) proteins and hnRNP
proteins. Small molecules that affect their activities or their relative
amounts in the nucleus can profoundly modify splicing.
RNA Aptamers
Aptamers are nucleic acids or species that have been
engineered through repeated rounds of in
vitro selection SELEX(systematic evolution of ligands by exponential
enrichment) to bind to a specific target molecule. RNA aptamers have been shown
to bind to proteins and perturb their function with a very high specificity and
affinity making their potential high for use as therapeutic drugs and research
tools. A system has been designed for in
vitro selection (SELEX) of an RNA aptamer to maximize its binding capacity
for a specified protein, which then is applied to a novel expression system
that uses specific genetic constructs, designs and promoters along with
transgenic techniques to produce either mono-or multivalent aptamers used as
conditional alleles in vivo.
micro-RNA (mi-RNA)
mi-RNAs are believed to regulate the expression of approximately
30% of all human genes. Thus, in contrast to antisense and RNAi, which target
single genes, targeting mi-RNAs has the potential of addressing whole disease
pathways.
The normal function of the cell depends on accurate expression
of various protein-coding and non-coding RNAs. These RNAs participate in
transcription and translation. The RNPs are the functional forms of the
corresponding RNAs and their normal activity depends on both the specific
composition and the precise arrangement of their protein constituents. As there
are numerous RNAs and a very large number of RNA-binding proteins, the
biogenesis of RNPs must be orchestrated with great fidelity. Disrupted
functions of RNAs and RNPs are the cause of numerous maladies.
Reversal of defective protein or restoration of normal protein
production can be achieved more efficaciously by eliminating or redirecting the
splicing of pre-m-RNA.
RNA-based strategies offer a series of novel therapeutic
applications including altered processing of the target pre-m-RNA transcript,
reprogramming of genetic defects through m-RNA repair, and the targeted
silencing of allele-or isoforms-specific gene transcripts.
Dear Readers
We are happy to receive your
encouraging response to our journal. We shall, however, appreciate receiving
your critical comments and suggestions for further improvements. We are always
looking forward to your specific contributions on various aspects of the
journal. The contributions shall be duly acknowledged.
Editor
a_files/image001.gif)
RNATherapeutics: Silencing the Culprit
Ranjeet
Kumar and Vinod Bhakuni
Division of Molecular and Structural Biology,
Central Drug Research Insttute, Lucknow-226001,
RNA
Biology
The biology of RNA is quite intriguing. A
contemporary discussion and thinking on the plethora of diversity they show in
terms of structure, function and complexity demands understanding of the
molecule in a blue sky perspective. The multiplicity of their forms from being
coding, non-coding and their proven role in therapeutics makes the small
molecule pivotal thus opening a new world of ribomics or ribonucleomics. The
short review is a humble attempt to put the known scenario in right
perspective; it does not endeavor to put copious information already
circulating in the webosphere.
Ribonucleic
acid
(RNA) is a biomolecule which
consists of ordered repeats of nucleotide units. The backbone cocktail is a
mixture of nitrogenous base, ribose sugar and phosphate moiety. RNA is quite
similar to DNA but differs on the parameters of being single stranded,
harboring a ribose sugar and thymine being replaced by uracil. DNA undergoes
transcription to yield RNA the process mediated by RNA polymerases which is
further translated to yield the building blocks of life-proteins. A fine orchestra
of RNA and protein assembly is involved to produce life’s key molecular machine,
ribosomes the site for protein synthesis, which is nature’s marvelous ergonomic
design. Diversity exists in forms, structure and function of RNA and their
crucial role in fine tuning and regulating intricate gene expression and being
the genome material of viruses has evoked great interest globally to unveil
these molecules. Thus RNA biology takes centre stage of today’s therapeutic
scenario.
Types
and Diversity of RNAs (their origin and implications)
The diversity of
RNA is mind boggling with pleotropicity in their functional assignments. The family is mainly represented by coding
and non coding RNAs. The transcriptomal process involves a consortium
Correspondence
to Vinod Bhakuni, Division of Molecular and Structural Biology, CDRI,
of four major RNAs the hnRNA (hetronuclear) being processed
further to yield m-RNA by polyadenylation at the 3’ tail and capping at 5’ end
this forms the coding RNAs. All other RNA falls under the broad umbrella of
non-coding RNA. The rRNA (ribosomal) and proteins combine together to form
macromolecular machines called ribosomes which serve as site for protein
synthesis. The tRNAs are the carrier and forwarding agents which read the code
(codon –anticodon matching) and bring about one aminoacid from the cellular
pool to be attached each time in the elongating chain of polypeptides. The cell
harbours twenty different types of tRNAs which are appropriately recruited to
form diverse protein molecules.
The non coding
RNAs form an even more interesting group of small RNAs. The members have quite
interesting functional attributes. The siRNA christened as small interfering
RNA or silencing RNA is a class of 20-25 nucleotides, double stranded RNA
molecules which are mainly involved in RNAi (RNA interference) pathway. The
molecule is involved in PTGS (Post Transcriptional Gene Silencing), antiviral
mechanism and chroma in remodelling and dynamics. The enigma is now being
investigated in greater details for discovery of the phenomenon by David
Baulcombe’s in plants and Thomas Tuschl in mammalian cells which has opened up
new vistas in biomedical research and drug devlopment and paved a new branch of
interference biology.
Micro RNA (mi
RNA) is another member belonging to gene regulatory small RNAs. These 21-23
nucleotide species are synthesised and processed from single stranded RNA
precursors and show partial complementarity to m-RNA target molecule. These
intresting molecules have multiple function with their role in cellular growth,
apoptosis, neuronal remodelling, their enhanced presence may lead to Fragile X
mental retardation. They have been further attributed to cancer. These undergo
various processing to form a dismantling machine that finally chew up m-RNA
molecules thus regulating and sometime disorienting normal gene expression.
Small nucleolar RNA (sno RNA) or sn RNA (small nuclear RNA) are mainly
responsible for bringing out biochemical modification of such as methylation
and pseudouridylation of rRNA, tRNA and other small nuclear RNA.
There are some
other types of RNAs such as telomerase RNA which provides RNA template that is
acted upon by telomerase, a reverse transcriptase to synthesize DNA at the
chromosomal ends as it gets shortened up in each replication cycle. The
telomerase has role in aging and cancer and also in cri-du chat syndrome. RNase MRP RNA is a subunit
component of mitochondrial RNA processing (MRP) enzyme complex. This enzyme is
involved in multiple cellular RNA processing and is associated with
cartilage-hair hypoplasia (CHH), a recessively inherited devlopmental disorder.
Ribonuclease P (RNase P) is another type of catalytic RNA (Ribozymes)
discovered by Sidney Altman (Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1989)-- it cleaves extra
precursor RNA from tRNA molecules[1]. It’s further attributed to efficietly control transcription of small non
coding RNA genes. Vault RNA (vRNA) is vault ribonucleoprotein complex
constituted of major vault protein (MVP) and two minor vault proteins (VPARP
and TEP1) with small untranslated RNA
molecules-- these are mainly attributed to drug resistance[2]. The YRNA are part of ribonucleoprotein particle
(Ro RNP) first identified by Learner et.al as target of autoimmune antibodies
in systemic lupus erythmatosus (SLE). Its main function is to put a quality
check on maturing 5S rRNA and is proved to be required for DNA replication [3]. Piwi-interacting RNA (pi RNA) is the largest class
of small RNA molecules expressed in animal cells[4]. They form riboprotein complex on interacting with
piwi protein. They are crucial in transcriptional gene silencing of
retrotransposons mainly in germ line cells. They are very unique from other
family by virtue of their complexity, no sequence conservation and being 26-31
nucleotides in length.
The RNA viruses
or retroviruses have RNA as their genetic material. There biology opens an
entirely new and exciting field in virology and pathogenesis that is RNA
toxicity.
Thus existence of a galaxy of RNA, sharing
the common backbone structure but markedly differing in the functional arena
controlling process of gene regulation, protein synthesis silencing genes,
regulating chromatin dynamics and acting as a quality control machinery, all
add to sea of avenues for harnessing their therapeutic potential and thus
opening an exciting oddyssey for candid evaluation of the molecule in fathomic
details.
a_files/image005.gif)
RNA
and Disease (Mutations in exons/introns/RNPs)
The
transcriptome comprises of coding as well as significant regions of non coding
RNA. The non coding sequences were earlier thought to be junk and no functional
attribute was associated with them but with the advancement in trascriptomics
they were known to influence and fine
tune gene regulation. Expansion of the microsatellite repeats in the non coding
regions resulted in the synthesis of pathogenic RNA’s now thought to be the
culprit behind some dominantly inherited neurological disorders[5]. The gain of
function effects by these non coding regions can be attributed to different
pathological consequences. Expression of the toxic RNA
is associated with formation of nuclear inclusions and
late-onset degenerative changes in brain, heart or skeletal muscle.
Myotonic dystrophy is caused by one such phenomenon where regulation of
alternative splicing gets compromised due to sequestering of RNA binding
proteins by toxic RNAs.
The finest
example of toxic role of RNA is polyglutamine disease. In this case dangerous
molecular shapes, that resulted by formation of hairpins in case of long CAG
repeats were efficiently examined by altering the sequence CAACAG so that no
more hairpin could be formed but the sanctity of protein under question and the
blueprint of it remain unpertuerbed. It was found that this very alteration
drastically reduces neurodegeneration by scrambling the RNA structure mitigated toxicity. This common
theme of triple repeat expansion diseases is also prevalent in fragile x
syndrome and myotonic dystrophy.
Myotonic
Dystrophy (DM) in which either a CTG or CCTG expansion, located within
noncoding regions of separate genes, results in strikingly similar effects. The
role for an RNA gain-of-function has been firmly established as a major
pathogenic event in DM. There is now substantial evidence that other diseases
caused by noncoding expansions involve an RNA gain-of-function mechanism [6].
These diseases include fragile X tremor ataxia syndrome (FXTAS),
spinocerebellar ataxia type 8 (SCA8), SCA10, SCA12, and Huntington's disease
like 2 (HDL2)[7].
Recent progress in DM has provided a paradigm for understanding pathogenic
mechanisms of RNA mediated disorders.
Fragile
X Syndrome (FXS) is caused by expansion of trinucleotide gene sequence CGG on X
chromosome. This resulted in inability to express FMR-1 protein which is
crucial for neuronal development. It’s an inherited mental impairment[8].
The
diseases which are based on toxic RNA are goverened by common mechanism of gain
of function effect. An insight into the disorders that are being governed by
toxic RNA becomes crucial due to absence and nearly no concrete therapeutic
regimen against them.
Representative
list of some common RNA mitigated diseases
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) SMN2
splicing
Dyskeratosis congenita (X-linked) DKC1 telomerase/translation
Prostate cancer SNHG5 ribosome biogenesis
Myotonic dystrophy, type 1 (DM1) DMPK (RNA gain
of function) protein kinase
Myotonic dystrophy, type 2 (DM2) ZNF9 (RNA gain
of function) RNA binding
Spinocerebellar ataxia 8 (SCA8) ATXN8/ATXN8OS (RNA
gain of function) unknown/noncoding RNA
Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia FMR1(RNA gain of function) syndrome translation/m-RNA
localization
Fragile X syndrome FMR1
translation/m-RNA
localization
Retinitis pigmentosa PRPF31
splicing
Retinitis pigmentosa PRPF8 splicing
Retinitis pigmentosa HPRP3
splicing
Retinitis pigmentosa PAP1 splicing
Autism 7q22-q33
locus breakpoint noncoding
RNA
Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) H19 noncoding
RNA
Cancer SFRS1
splicing, translation, export
Cancer RBM5
splicing
Cancer miR-17-92
cluster RNA interference
Cancer miR-372,
miR-373 RNA interference
.
New
Approaches of RNA (Therapeutics/ siRNA)
The Human Genome
Project delineated about 34,000 genes that code directly for functional proteins.
Rest of the genome has been labeled as “junk” because of no obvious function[9]. Recently, RNA
biology received global attention with a paradigm shift that the junk genome
produces around half a million varieties of RNA which must be having regulatory
roles rather than an evolutionary burden. This has open new vistas in research
with discussions centered on staggering variety of RNA types produced from this
“junk” and the huge potential implications that the finding promises. Specific
genes associated with diseases processes can be targeted using RNA interference
(RNAi)[10]. This
innovative approach has great therapeutic implications, thus this very idea of
harnessing the process as a therapeutic product will herald a new dimension in
gene therapy and nucleic acid based therapeutics.
The technology
has been a boon since the first report came in 2001 regarding RNA mediated
silencing of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)[11]. The
technology has undergone several studies and promises attractive alternative in
case of hepatitis B and C virus (HBV and HCV, respectively) including dengue
virus (DENV), Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), yellow fever virus (YFV) and
West Nile virus (WNV), recent report regarding HIV-1 reveals that targeting the
chemokine receptor CCR5 host protein that act as coreceptor for the virus but
whose mutation is compatible with normal life can be used for attenuation.
Apart from viral
diseases, protozoans that particularly cause havoc have also been shown to get
attenuated and silenced. In Trypanosoma
brucei dsRNA could induce sequence-specific m-RNA degradation [12].The study in
case of plasmodium revealed that the mechanisms of RNAi like silencing do exist
in plasmodium. But still dilemma exista as unlike T.brucei, P.
falciparum has no relevant homolog to Dicer, Piwi, PAZ or other genes
involved in the RNAi pathways [13,14]. The studies
also become quite pivotal due to widespread resistence against currently
available antimalarials.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis the world’s
most successful pathogen which does evade almost all available chemotherapy by
its multidrug resistence has shown promising results in feasibility of
utilizing antisense technology. One group has shown that when phosphorothioate-modified
antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotides were used against the m-RNA of glutamine
synthetase associated with Mycobacterium pathogenicity and formation of
a poly-L-glutamate/glutamine cell wall structure, it reduces the expression and
activity thereby having profound impact on bacterial replication[15]. Another
recent study reports inhibition of mycobacterial growth by inhibition of the
lysosomal enzyme beta-exosaminidase, which is a peptidoglycan hydrolase that
facilitates mycobacteria-induced secretion of lysosomes at the macrophage
plasma membrane [16].
Thymine
production is controlled by DHFR (Dihydro Folate Reductase) which is very
important for rapidly dividing cells. Inhibiting DHFR will prevent the growth
of neoplastic cancerous cells from ordinary cells that do get transformed in to
cancerous cells as in prostate cancer (Dr Alexandre Akoulitchev,
Thus,
a birds eye view of the landscape that the technology promises are virtually
interesting because it provides an upper hand to silence toxic genes by using
an endogenous mechanism that is inherently present in most of the organisms. Be
it viral diseases or protozoan or dreaded diseases like tuberculosis and cancer
all these can be visualised to be manipulated by this RNA based therapeutics.
RNA
and Future
This small
molecule has been the pool of panacea for treatment of malignant diseases and
rescue from other wide variety of old and emerging diseases. The current
generation of targeted therapy, however, is not amicable to many new
therapeutic targets and increasing drug resistance among patients which add to
the burgeoning severity. The new school of thoughts now clearly put-forth the
importance of genome based safe therapeutics including the RNA technology.
Antisense armamentorium when amalgamated with the advance nanoscience and drug
delievery strategy is surely bound to fulfill the long cherished dream of
biochemists to device “magic bullets” for treatment of whole spectrum of
diseases including cancer and AIDS. Recent reports suggest that RNA itself can
be ergonomically prototyped to dock many therapeutic molecules simultaneously
and target it to particular cell type. The fact that
microRNA (miRNA) are evolutionarily conserved, suggests that miRNA therapeutics
may have fewer side effects as compared to the artificial siRNAs. At present
the miRNA/RNA-i therapeutics field is in its juvenile
stage but a wave of optimism exists in the science fraternity to end up the
gestation and prepare a firm platform for the birth of RNA therapeutics.
References
[1] Guerrier-Takada C, Marsh T, Pace N, Altman
S The RNA moiety of ribonuclease P is the catalytic subunit of the enzyme, Cell
35 (1983) 849–857.
[2] V.A. Kickhoefer, Y. Liu, L.B. Kong, B.E.
Snow, P.L. Stewart, L. Harrington, L.H. Rome, The Telomerase/vault-associated
protein TEP1 is required for vault RNA stability and its association with the
vault particle, The Journal of cell biology 152 (2001) 157-164.
[3] A. Belisova, K. Semrad, O. Mayer, G.
Kocian, E. Waigmann, R. Schroeder, G. Steiner, RNA chaperone activity of protein
components of human Ro RNPs, RNA (New York, N.Y 11 (2005) 1084-1094.
[4] A.G.
Seto, R.E. Kingston, N.C. Lau, The coming
of
age for Piwi proteins, Molecular cell 26 (2007) 603-609.
[5] L.P. Ranum, T.A. Cooper, RNA-Mediated
Neuromuscular
Disorders, Annual review of neuroscience
(2006).
[6] G. Tiscornia, M.S. Mahadevan, Myotonic
dystrophy: the role of the CUG triplet repeats in splicing of a novel DMPK exon
and altered cytoplasmic DMPK m-RNA isoform ratios, Molecular cell 5 (2000)
959-967.
[7] T.A. Cooper, L. Wan, G. Dreyfuss, RNA and
disease, Cell 136 (2009) 777-793.
[8] S.J. Moore, L. Strain, G.F. Cole, Z.
Miedzybrodzka,
K.F. Kelly, J.C. Dean, Fragile X syndrome with FMR1 and FMR2 deletion, Journal
of medical genetics 36 (1999) 565-566.
[9] W.W. Gibbs, The unseen genome: gems among
the junk, Scientific American 289 (2003) 26-33.
[10] N. Agrawal, P.V. Dasaradhi, A. Mohmmed, P.
Malhotra, R.K. Bhatnagar, S.K. Mukherjee, RNA interference: biology, mechanism,
and applications, Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67 (2003) 657-685.
[11] V. Bitko, S. Barik, Phenotypic silencing of
cytoplasmic genes using sequence-specific double-stranded short interfering RNA
and its application in the reverse genetics of wild type negative-strand RNA
viruses, BMC microbiology 1 (2001) 34.
[12] H. Ngo, C. Tschudi, K. Gull, E. Ullu,
Double-stranded RNA induces m-RNA degradation in Trypanosoma brucei,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
95 (1998) 14687-14692.
[13] L. Aravind, L.M. Iyer, T.E. Wellems, L.H.
Miller, Plasmodium biology: genomic gleanings, Cell 115 (2003) 771-785.
[14] E. Ullu, C. Tschudi, T. Chakraborty, RNA
interference in protozoan parasites, Cellular microbiology 6 (2004) 509-519.
[15] G. Harth, M.A. Horwitz, D. Tabatadze, P.C.
Zamecnik, Targeting the Mycobacterium tuberculosis 30/32-kDa mycolyl
transferase complex as a therapeutic strategy against tuberculosis: Proof of
principle by using antisense technology, Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America 99 (2002) 15614-15619.
[16] I.C. Koo, Y.M. Ohol, P. Wu, J.H. Morisaki,
J.S. Cox, E.J. Brown, Role for lysosomal enzyme beta-hexosaminidase in the
control of mycobacteria infection, Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America 105 (2008) 710-715.
[17] I. Martianov, A. Ramadass, A. Serra Barros,
N. Chow, A. Akoulitchev, Repression of the human dihydrofolate reductase gene
by a non-coding interfering transcript, Nature 445 (2007) 666-670.
Gift Subscription
Contributions are
invited for our Journals:( I ). Current R&D Highlights and
( ii.) Industry
Highlights on any of the following aspects of
Drugs &
Pharmaceuticals
Industry and
Policy
R&D and
Technology
Biotechnology
Health Care
Natural Products
Traditional
Medicines
Information
Technology
Intellectual
Property Rights
Diagnostics &
Prophylactics
You
may contribute detailed Feature articles (upto 2000 words) or your views (upto 1000 words) on any of the above or
related topics concerning Drugs and Pharmaceuticals. All those, whose articles
or views are accepted for publication, will be offered one year Gift
Subscription for one of the above journals.
Kindly
send your article(s) entered in a floppy in MS-Word, Wordstar, Word Perfect,
Pagemaker, or in non document mode alongwith a print out as per the
Instructions to Authors given on the Back-inside cover.
For Further
details, please contact:
The Scientist
–in-Charge
Science and Technology
Knowledge Resource Centre
Central Drug
Research Institute
Post Box No.173,
Tel: 2613812:
2612411-18 (Extn. 4276)
Fax: 0522-2623405
& 2623938
Website: www.cdriindia.org
Email: sheela_tandon@cdri.res.in
a_files/image001.gif)
Genesis R&D Taps International Partner for Gene Silencing
Genesis
Research and Development Corp., the Auckland-based biotechnology company, is
planning to tap an international venture capital group to partner on a new
subsidiary to undertake its gene silencing project.
The
company expects to finalise the new investment within the next few weeks, and
will retain a majority holding in the subsidiary, chief executive Stephen Hall
told BusinessWire. The company told shareholders yesterday it has an “urgent”
need for cash, with funds on hand currently standing at NZ$ 300,000. Genesis
will offer a share purchase plan to raise funds while it attempts to sell some
assets and recoup debt.
Genesis applied to patent its gene
silencing technology, which uses RNA interference to target the growth and drug
resistance of cancer cells. The company confirmed it would focus on the
technology and seek a partner to continue its development of the RNAi
mechanism.
(http://www.scoop.co.n/stories/B40907/S00020.htm)
Minicells' Breakdown
Cancer Resistance
Australian
researchers have developed a new technique that could prevent resistance in
cancer cells. The researchers say the breakthrough could lead to cheaper cancer
treatments with fewer side effects.
The
new therapy used minicells to deliver cancer therapy drugs to resistant tumours
in mice. The minicells were made from bacteria and contained pieces of genetic
material known as short interference RNA (siRNA), which knockout or 'silence'
the drug-resistant genes of tumours. Several days later, researchers injected
another dose of minicells filled with chemotherapy drugs, which the tumour was
previously resistant to.
Molecular
biologist and joint director of the biotechnology company Engeneic Dr Himanshu
Brahmbhatt says cancer cells have an inbuilt mechanism to develop drug
resistance over time. "[Drug resistance] is one of our biggest killers in
terms of cancer therapy," he says. Brahmbhatt says by silencing the genes
of the drug-resistant tumour cell, the cancers become sensitive to the
chemotherapy again.
Previously,
researchers believed siRNA was unable to pass through cell membranes due to
their size. But Brahmbhatt says their research has shown this isn't necessarily
the case. "Bacterial membranes might be quite different because they have
protein channels [in their membrane] through which siRNA's can enter [the
minicell]." As well as being packed with gene silencing siRNA, the outside
of the minicell membrane is coated with antibodies. Brahmbhatt says these
antibodies to lock onto [antigen] receptors on the tumour cells. "The
cancer cell then swallows the entire minicell."
Once
the minicell is inside the cancer cell, its breaksdown and the siRNA or the
drug floods the interior of the tumour cell, says Brahmbhatt. "That's why
we haven't seen any toxic side effects because this is intra-cellular
delivery."
The
study shows that the combined minicell therapy can inhibit the growth of
drug-resistant tumour xenographs, artificially manufactured tumours, for up to
four months. Brahmbhatt says their studies have now moved beyond using mice
models to dogs suffering relapsed cancers. "We've treated these dogs with
sequential treatment, siRNAs followed by drugs, and we are getting the same
sort of results in these animals with real cancers." Medical oncologist
Stephen Clarke, of the
But Clarke says this type of therapy is a
long way off clinical use and more research needs to be done to ensure
complications don't arise in humans. Clarke says the foreign antibodies on the
outside of the minicells could create an immune response and negate their
effect. Even if the antibodies don't activate the immune system, they may not
be able to attach to all tumour cells, he says. "Human tumours are so
molecularly diverse, it's possible that if not all the tumour are expressing
the protein [antigen] you're targeting, you may have a patchy effect,"
says Clarke.
(http://www.abc.net.au/science/article/2009/06/29/2609592.htm)
Genome-wide
Map Shows Precisely Where microRNAs Do Their Work
MicroRNAs
are the newest kid on the genetic block. By regulating the unzipping of genetic
information, these tiny molecules have set the scientific world alight with
such wide-ranging applications as onions that can’t make you cry and
therapeutic potential for new treatments for viral infections, cancer and
degenerative diseases. But the question remains: How do they work?
Robert
B. Darnell, head of the Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-oncology, and his team at
MicroRNAs
rewrote the rules of gene expression in 2001 when they were found to bind to
messenger RNA and shut down protein production, a process called RNA
interference. By 2006, when the Nobel Prize in medicine was given for the
discovery of RNA interference, scientists around the globe had even narrowed
down microRNAs’ primary site of action to somewhere around the end of the RNA
transcript. What scientists couldn’t nail down was the exact string of
nucleotides to which the microRNAs bind along a messenger RNA transcript. “To
understand exactly how microRNAs work, you want to know their precise targets,”
says Darnell, who is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator and Robert
and Harriet Heilbrunn Professor at Rockefeller. “You want a map that tells you
which messenger RNAs each microRNA targets and exactly where they are binding.”
The
problem was that on any given messenger RNA, there are many sites to which a
single microRNA can theoretically bind, and there are hundreds of microRNAs in
every cell. Prior techniques — primarily relying on computer predictions —
weren’t very good at sorting through the morass of predictions to identify the
real sites, explains Darnell. The trick to getting such a map was to freeze a
snapshot of microRNAs directly bound to messenger RNA in living cells. Working
specifically in mouse brain tissue, that’s what Darnell and his team did using
a technique the lab developed called high throughput sequence-crosslinking
immunoprecipitation, or HITS-CLIP.
In order to shut down a gene before it is
translated, microRNAs must be guided to their target messenger RNAs via a
protein called Argonaute. The Argonaute-microRNA-messenger RNA complex now
forms a sandwich structure where the microRNA is compressed in the middle. By
using their technique to fuse Argonaute to these two RNAs, the team was then
able to identify the bound microRNA and its precise target sites across all
messenger RNAs expressed in the mouse brain.
(http:/www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/09061810622.htm)
Undruggable Cancer
Genes May Not Be Invincible
Nearly
a third of all cancers have mutations in the gene KRAS, yet there are no drugs to
combat these changes. And KRAS is not unusual—other common cancer
genes are also considered "undruggable." But as two new studies
report, cancer cells driven by these genes may be vulnerable to another kind of
attack. A technology called RNA interference can identify "normal"
genes in tumor cells that are required for the survival of these cells, and one
of these genes may turn out to be an Achilles' heel.
Two
independent groups led by researchers at
The
researchers used short bits of RNA to target and silence individual genes in
cells. While clinical trials will be needed to learn whether patients benefit
from this approach, the findings are supported by smaller studies, including
one that revealed potential drug targets for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
"What
these screens do is give us potential leads for new cancer drugs," said
Dr. Stephen Elledge, one of the lead investigators. "There must be whole
networks of non-oncogenes out there that tumors depend on," he noted, but
the genes are difficult to find because they do not have any mutations or
alterations.
His team identified a number of genes
related to mitosis, including one called PLK1, that are potential
therapeutic targets. In tumor cells, KRAS mutations altered the fidelity
of mitosis in a way that made the cells die when these genes were inhibited.
Thus, cells with KRAS mutations may be vulnerable to antimitotic drugs
that target these genes, the researchers said.
(National Cancer InstituteJune 16, 2009 • Volume 6 / Number 12)
Carbohydrate Acts as Tumor Suppressor
Scientists
at Burnham Institute for Medical Research have discovered that specialized
complex sugar molecules (glycans) that anchor cells into place act as tumor
suppressors in breast and prostate cancers. These glycans play a critical role
in cell adhesion in normal cells, and their decrease or loss leads to increased
cell migration by invasive cancer cells and metastasis. An increase in
expression of the enzyme that produces these glycans, β3GnT1, resulted in
a significant reduction in tumor activity.
The
specialized glycans are capable of binding to laminin and are attached to the
α-DG cell surface protein. This binding facilitates adhesion between
epithelial and basement membrane cells and prevents cells from migrating. The
team of scientists, led by Professor Minoru Fukuda, demonstrated that
β3GnT1 controls the synthesis of laminin-binding glycans in concert with
the genes LARGE/LARGE2. Down-regulation of β3GnT1 reduces the number of
glycans, leading to greater movement by invasive cancer cells. However, when
the researchers forced aggressive cancer cells to express β3GnT1, the
laminin-binding glycans were restored and tumor formation decreased.
"These results indicate that certain
carbohydrates on normal cells and enzymes that synthesize those glycans, such
as β3GnT1, function as tumor suppressors," said Dr. Fukuda."
Upregulation of β3GnT1 may become a novel way to treat cancer."
(http:/www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090706181449.htm)
MicroRNAs Help Control HIV
Life Cycle
Scientists at Burnham Institute for Medical Research (Burnham)
have discovered that specific microRNAs (non-coding RNAs that interfere with
gene expression) reduce HIV replication and infectivity in human T-cells. In
particular, miR29 plays a key role in controlling the HIV life cycle. The study
suggests that HIV may have co-opted this cellular defense mechanism to help the
virus hide from the immune system and antiviral drugs.
Tariq
Rana, director of the Program for RNA Biology at Burnham, and colleagues, found
that the microRNA-miR29 suppresses translation of the HIV-1 genome by
transporting the HIV m-RNA to processing-bodies (P-bodies), where they are
stored or destroyed. This results in a reduction of viral replication and
infectivity. The study also showed that inhibition of miR29 enhances viral
replication and infectivity. The scientists further demonstrated that strains
of HIV-1 with mutations in the region of the genome that interact with miR29
are not inhibited by miR29.
(http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/155430.php)
New Clues to Cholesterol
Control
Scientists have uncovered 20 "cholesterol control"
genes that could help point to important new risk factors for heart disease. The
researchers looked for genes with similar patterns of behaviour to those
already known to be involved in cholesterol regulation.
They then tested the activity of the 100 most promising
candidates with a scientific technique called RNA interference (RNAi). The
technique uses tiny bits of the genetic molecule RNA to block the
protein-making "instructions" issued by genes. In this way, the
function of genes can be assessed by effectively switching them off. The
strategy identified 20 genes described as "immediately relevant" for
maintaining cellular levels of cholesterol.
Some them are thought to influence levels of low-density
lipoprotein, or "bad" cholesterol, in the blood, a major heart
disease risk factor. Study leader Dr Heiko Runz, from the
Oncolytic Adenovirus
Mediated Survivin Knockdown by RNA Interference Suppresses Human Colorectal
Carcinoma Growth in vitro and in vivo.
Colorectal
cancer is a one of the most common alimentary malignancies. Survivin has been
proved by many studies to be an ideal target for cancer gene therapy because of
its strong anti-apoptotic effect. The reduction of Survivin expression by means
of chemically synthesized small interfering RNA or small hairpin RNA expressed
from plasmid and resulted growth inhibition of cancer cells had been proved by
many studies including ours, but the transfection efficiency was not
encouraging. So for the first time we constructed the Survivin shRNA into an
oncolytic adenovirus, tested its effects on colorectal cancer cell lines and
nude mice xenograft model. In this study, researchers constructed an oncolytic
adenovirus with a Survivin targeted small hairpin RNA and a reporter gene
(ZD55-Sur-EGFP). The expression of Survivin m-RNA and protein were analyzed by
RT-PCR and western blot. The cell growth and apoptosis were tested by in vitro cytopathic assay, MTT assay and
flow cytometry respectively. The effect of the constructed virus on xenograft
model was evaluated by tumor volume and western blot analysis. RESULTS:
ZD55-Sur-EGFP replicated in cancer cells specifically, reduced the expression
of Survivin m-RNA and protein expression effectively (P < 0.0001), induced
cancer cell apoptosis and inhibited SW480 cell growth both in vitro and in vivo
significantly. We conclude Survivin RNA interference combining with oncolytic
adenovirus virotherapy could be a promising treatment for colorectal cancer.
(J.of Experimental &
Clinical Research 2009, 28; 81)
Subscription
Form
To,
The
Scientist-in-Charge
S&T Knowledge Resource
Centre
Central Drug Research
Institute
Post Box No. 173,
Lucknow-226 001,
Dear Sir,
I/My organization want to be the annual
subscriber of:
1. Drugs and
Pharmaceuticals - Industry Highlights
2. Drugs and Pharmaceuticals - Current R&D Highlights
I/We am/are remitting the subscription amount
of Rs./$ __________________ by Demand Draft No. __________________ dated
_______________ towards subscription of the journal(s) as (1) Student/
Professional, (2) Educational/R&D Institution, (3) Corporate Sector
subscriber.
Name :
____________________________________________________
Address :
___________________________________________________
:
____________________________________________________
SIGNATURE
WITH SEAL
Please send your payment by Demand Draft only in favour of
THE DIRECTOR,
CENTRAL DRUG RESEARCH
INSTITUTE,
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of
endogenous non-coding RNAs of 19–24 nucleotides in length that play an
important role in the negative regulation of gene expression by base-pairing to
complementary sites on the target m-RNAs, causing a block of
translation or degradation of the target m-RNA The biogenesis of microRNAs is a complex and
coordinated process in which different groups of enzymes and associated
proteins, located in the nucleus and in the cytoplasm, carry out the multistep
maturation of these tiny RNAs .
The
most important characterization of the function of microRNAs is the
identification of m-RNA targets. Because the animal miRNAs have a 5′end
restricted complementarity to the m-RNA target (only 5–8 nucleotides perfectly
complementary), the RNA sequence named ‘seed region’, the miRNAs are predicted
to regulate a large number of animal genes. Different algorithms have been
developed to predict the animal miRNA targets; they are based on different
criteria, resulting from the analysis of the in
vivo demonstrated targets:
(i) perfect or nearly perfect base-paring at the seed region and
thermodynamically stability of the duplex miRNA–m-RNA; (ii) phylogenetic
conservation of the seed region; (iii) multiple target sites in a single target
by the same or different miRNAs; (iv) absence of strong secondary structures at
the miRNA-binding site on the target. Several computational procedures are
available to predict microRNA targets.
In some studies, key target m-RNAs have
been identified, but still relatively little is known of the functional role of
miRNAs in mammalian species. It is known, however, that the miR-let7 family may
play a role in oncogenesis via RAS oncogene m-RNAs. Enforced expression of the
miR-17-92 cluster from chromosome 13q32-33, in conjunction with c-myc,
accelerates tumor development in a mouse B cell lymphoma model .
Functional studies indicated that miR-221
and 222 inhibit normal erythropoiesis and erythroleukemic cell growth at least
partly via Kit receptor downmodulation, and their ectopic overexpression
directly results in p27Kip1 downregulation
in aggressive prostate Although miRNAs operate in a similar
fashion as short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) , they typically target several transcripts
instead of one specific gene , regulating about 30% of the
protein coding genes of the human genome. MiR-21 has not only a role in
tumorigenesis through regulation of the tumor suppressor genes tropomyosin 1
(TPM1) and PTEN, but is also involved in invasion and tumor metastasis by
targeting programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) and maspin.
Most
genes that are targeted by miRNAs appear to have multiple, co-clustered binding
sites for multiple miRNAs in their m-RNA, and miRNA genes are thus likely to
act combinatorially on target genes.
Furthermore,
miRNAs are differentially expressed in developmental stages, cell types, and
tissues, and recent data suggest their role not only in physiological processes
but also in many human diseases, including cancer, raising hope for the
development of new drugs that targeting microRNAs and their gene networks could
sensitize cells to therapy with greater efficacy.
MicroRNAs and Diseases
Currently the biological functions of
miRNAs are actively being sought. Some studies have notably uncovered roles for
miRNAs in cellular processes including apoptosis, proliferation,
stress resistance, metabolism,
defense against pathogenic infections, neural development and importantly,
tumorigenesis .
Table 1.
Examples of microRNAs, which have been shown to
be modulated in many pathological diseases, are indicated with their putative m-RNA
targets
|
Pathologies |
miRNAs Involved |
Putative m-RNA(s) targets |
|
Alzheimer |
miR-107 |
BACE-1 |
|
|
miR-125b |
|
|
|
miR-9 |
|
|
|
miR-128 |
|
|
Parkinson |
miR133b |
Pitx3 |
|
Liver dysfunction |
miR122 |
CAT-1 |
|
Hepatic viral infection |
miR-122 |
HCV (Heptitis C virus) |
|
Myopathies |
miR146b |
|
|
|
Mir-221 |
|
|
|
miR-222 |
|
|
|
miR-155 |
|
|
|
miR-214 |
|
|
Sustained cardiac hyperthropathy |
miR-133 |
RhoA, Nelf-A/WHSC2 |
|
Arrythmogenesis |
miR-1 |
Kcnj2, GJA1 |
To date, most efforts have been directed
toward the study of alteration of miRNA expression in many diseases. Recent
evidence suggests that miRNAs may be a contributing factor in
neurodegeneration. Furthermore, studies in mammals and in invertebrates have
suggested that miRNAs are involved in neuroprotection, fragile X syndrome , and
schizophrenia. Together, these observations indicate that neurodegenerative
diseases might result from the alteration of different cellular pathways, and
miRNAs may have a role.
miRNAs and Cancer
Although studies linking miRNA
dysfunctions to human diseases are in their infancy, a great deal of data already
exist, establishing an important role for miRNAs in the pathogenesis of cancer.
The first evidence that miRNAs are involved in cancer comes from the finding
that miR-15 and miR-16 are downregulated or deleted in most patients with
chronic lymphocytic leukemia. This discovery has projected miRNAs to the center
stage of molecular oncology. Several groups, in the past few years, have
studied miRNA expression in cancer patients and found that miRNAs are
differentially expressed not only in normal and tumor tissues but are also differentially expressed in
primary tumors and metastatic tissue . These differences are
tumor specific and in some cases are associated with prognosis. Evidence indicates that some
miRNAs can function either as oncogenes or tumor suppressors .
The
let-7 family contains miRNAs that have been shown to regulate the RAS family of
oncogenes through post-transcriptional repression. Studies have
indicated that a miRNA by itself could induce a neoplastic disease. Genome-wide
analysis of miRNA expression in different steps of gastric carcinogenesis was
performed. Deregulation of E2F1 activity and resistance to TGF-β are
hallmarks of gastric cancer. miR-106b-25 cluster upregulation impairs the
TGF-β tumor suppressor pathway, interfering with the expression of
p21Waf1/Cip1 and Bim. These results suggest that the miR-106b-25 cluster plays
a key role in gastric cancer interfering with proteins involved both in cell
cycle and apoptosis .
Researchers indicate that miR-126 and
miR-335, whose expression is lost in human breast cancer cells, modulate
metastatic potential.
MicroRNAs and Drug Response
MiRNAs
are attractive drug targets since they regulate expression of many proteins in
the cell and are differentially expressed in malignant versus normal cells .
Taking into account that according to recent computer predictions, each miRNA
could have more than hundred of target m-RNAs in the cell, this multi-target regulation might be
responsible for adverse or non-target effects in a future microRNA
mediated-therapy.
Conclusions
Since
their discovery, 15 years ago, miRNAs have been recognized as mediators of
transcription regulation. This review discusses their role in many diseases and
an emerging, novel function of microRNA: their role in drug resistance.
The
molecular genetic basis of sensitivity and resistance to cancer therapeutics is
complex, involving multiple processes such as drug transport, drug metabolism,
DNA repair, and apoptosis. It is proposed that expression of more than one
third of human genes are under microRNA control; this explains their wide
action in many diseases, including cancer. Therefore, many genes that are drug
targets may be regulated by miRNAs. A miRNA that targets tumor suppressor
and/or pro-apoptotic proteins acts as an oncogene, giving rise to drugs
resistance by inhibiting apoptosis and enhancing cell cycle. Conversely, a
miRNA that targets an oncogene and/or anti-apoptotic proteins acts as a tumor
suppressor, leading to drugs sensitivity by enhancing apoptosis and/or by
blocking cell cycle. Here, a general model has been provided by
which tumor cells could respond to drug treatments, but, obviously, other
mechanisms such as gene amplification, deletion, or translocation can be
involved in tumor development and drug response .
Therefore, when combined with gene
expression profiles and other biological data, microRNAs expression profile may
provide crucial information for an understanding of cancer chemosensitivity and
chemoresistance with very important implication in disease treatment and
prevention.
(Based
on the article written by Michela Garofalo et al and published in Current
Opinion in Pharmacology (2008)8,661-67)
1.
General Principles of Alternative Splicing
1.1. Alternative pre-m-RNA splicing regulates the function
of the majority of protein-coding genes
An average human
protein-coding gene contains a mean of 8.8 exons with a mean size of 145nt. The
mean intron length is 3365nt and the 5′ and 3′ UTR are 770 and 300
nt, respectively; as a result, this “standard” gene spans about 27 kbp.
After pre-m-RNA processing the average m-RNA exported into the cytosol consists
of 1340 nt coding sequence, 1070 nt untranslated regions and a poly (A) tail.
This shows that more than 90% of the pre-m-RNA is removed as introns, and only
about 10% of the average pre-m-RNA is joined as exonic sequences by pre-m-RNA
splicing. Almost all protein-coding genes contain introns that are removed in
the nucleus by RNA splicing during pre-m-RNA processing. Exon usage is often
alternative, i.e. the cell decides whether to remove a part of the pre-m-RNA as
an intron or include this part in the mature m-RNA as an alternative exon. Alternative pre-m-RNA processing is a key regulator of gene
expression as it generates numerous transcripts from a single protein-coding
gene, which largely increases the use of genetic information. The process is
more widely used than previously thought and was recently estimated to affect
more than 88% of human protein-coding genes. An estimated 75%
of alternative exons encode protein parts and their alternate
use allows to generate multiple proteins from a single gene, which increases
the coding potential of the genome. Mapping of alternatively spliced regions on
known protein structures suggest that most alternative exons are in coiled or
loop regions that are located on the surface . Alternative
splicing generates protein isoforms with different biological properties that
differ in protein:protein interaction, subcellular localization, or catalytic
ability. More than a quarter of alternative exons introduce
premature stop codons in their m-RNAs. This can result either in the formation
of truncated proteins or in the degradation of the m-RNA in nonsense-mediated
decay. Recent array analyses indicate that although frequently found,
alternative exons with premature stop codons are present only in low abundance,
which question their role as a general shut-off mechanism for protein
production.
1.2. Changes in alternative splicing
can be the cause or consequence of human diseases
There are only a
few reports of mutations in core elements of the splicing machinery that result
in human diseases. For example, autosomal dominant forms of retinitis
pigmentosa is caused by mutation in the splicing factors PRPF31/U4-61k .
It is possible that defects in the general splicing machinery are generally not
compatible with life, whereas changes in alternative splicing can be tolerated
by an organism, although these changes might manifest in a disease. As
alternative splicing affects numerous genes, it is not surprising that changes
in alternative splicing are frequently associated with human diseases. It is
often not clear whether a change in alternative splicing causes a disease or is
an indicator for an underlying defect. A better mechanistical understanding of
splice site selection has helped in distinguishing these effects. The first
demonstration that exon sequences can have an effect on splice site selection
was published 20 years ago . Ten years later,
the first review about the impact of exonic mutations on splice site selection
postulated that silent mutations can interfere with exon usage and explained
how these mutations that do not change the predicted encoded protein can cause
a human disease . Since then, a better understanding of alternative splice site
selection contributed to a better understanding of human diseases and vice
versa. The number of diseases reported to be associated with changes in
alterative splicing increased dramatically and has been frequently reviewed ,
including in the form of a book. To facilitate the access to
this fast growing area for colleagues in other fields, a brief summary
disease-relevant aspects of splice site selection, are discussed with
well-established examples of alternative splicing changes that lead to human
disease and point out links between the diseases and aberrant splice site
selection.
1.3.
Alternative exons are regulated by combinatorial control through transient
formation of recognition complexes
Since splice sites follow only loose
consensus sequences, the key questions in alternative splicing regulation are:
How are splice sites recognized in the vast genomic sequence background, and
how are they differentially regulated? The mechanism of alternative splice site
recognition has been extensively reviewed. Exon recognition is regulated
by the interaction of proteins and ribonuclear proteins (trans-factors), with
sequence elements on the pre-m-RNA (cis-factors), which is summarized below.
1.4. Alternative exons are generated during evolution and
their usage can be changed by point mutations located outside the splice sites
Alternative exons can be generated by
three mechanisms: (i) exon shuffling, where an existing exon is duplicated
within the same gene and is then alternatively spliced, (ii) exonisation of
mobile genetic elements, such as Alu elements and (iii) a transformation of formally constitutive
exons into alternative ones. Since the approximately one
million human Alu elements are primate-specific elements that account for 10%
of the human genome, their exonisation provides a large reservoir
to generate new alternative exons. Numerous studies showed that synonymous
mutations in coding regions can influence splice site selection. There is now
also emerging evidence that intronic mutations and single-nucleotide
polymorphism can alter exon usage. It is thus likely that alternative exon usage is
an evolutionary ‘substrate’ that is subject to a large number of mutations. Due
to the complexity of the splicing regulation, the effects of mutations are
difficult to predict, but become obvious when they lead to human diseases.
Each of the regulatory principles listed
here can be altered to cause a human disease, which is schematically summarized
in .
2. Examples of Diseases Caused by
Alternative Splicing
Exons associated with diseases mentioned
in the text are listed. Since there are no unique accession numbers for exons,
the NCBI accession number is listed. The mutations having an effect on splicing
are listed under features and changed nucleotides are underlined. These
nucleotides are underlined in the sequence. Capital letters are exons, small
letters are introns.
2.1. Diseases caused by point mutations in regulatory
sequences
2.1.1. Spinal muscular atrophy as an
example of a recessive disease caused by a point mutation in an exonic
regulatory element
Spinal muscular
atrophy (SMA) describes several different diseases that are characterized by
degeneration of alpha motoneurons in the brainstem and spinal cord. Autosomal
recessive SMA associated with chromosome 5 is molecularly the best understood.
It is characterized by progressive paralysis caused by the loss of alpha-motor
neurons in the spinal cord. The incidence is 1:6000 to 1:10,000 for live births
and the carrier frequency is 1 in 40 . SMA is the second
most common autosomal recessive disorder.
Since children
suffering from cystic fibrosis now largely survive childhood, it is the most
frequent genetic cause of infantile death. SMA is caused by the loss of the SMN1 gene
that encodes the SMN protein, which regulates snRNP assembly. It is not clear
how the loss of SMN protein causes the disease and leads to a specific death of
motoneurons. Mouse studies revealed that the loss of SMN protein causes
cell-type specific changes in snRNAs and a generally reduced snRNP assembly
capacity. Numerous pre-m-RNA splicing events are deregulated in all tissues
analyzed. Some of the changes observed reflect a shift in known alternative
splicing patterns. However, the majority of the deregulated splicing events are
aberrant m-RNAs, which are normally not produced. These findings suggest that
(i) the selective death of motoneurons could be caused by the cumulative effect
of aberrantly splicing m-RNAs and (ii) that changes in cells surrounding the
motoneurons cause their death .
Genetic studies
identified six families with eight female members that were asymptomatic for
SMA, although they inherited the same SMN1 and SMN2 alleles as their affected
siblings . Plastin 3, an actin binding protein was identified as a
modifier. Overexpression of plastin 3 in SMN knock-out mice partially rescued
the short neuronal axon length causes by the absence of SMA protein. These
findings argue that that the death of motoneurons could be caused by a
mechanism different from a change in splicing. Although it is not understood how
the loss of SMA protein causes the disease, it is clear that restoration of SMA
protein production would be a therapeutic approach.
Humans possess a
gene, SMN2,
that is almost identical to SMN1. SMN2 was
generated through a recent duplication. Although both genes are almost
identical in sequence, due to a translationally silent C→T change at
position 6 in exon 7, they have different splicing patterns and exon 7 is
predominantly excluded in SMN2. This exon-skipping event
generates a truncated, less stable and probably non-functional protein.
Therefore, SMN2 cannot
compensate the loss of SMN1. At least one copy of SMN2 is retained
in humans with SMA, as lack of both SMN2 and SMN1 is
embryonically lethal. Mice have only one SMN gene
where exon 7 is constitutively spliced. A homozygous knock out of this gene is
lethal.
To study the
splicing regulation of the human gene in mice, transgenic animals that contain
the human gene were developed . Although, in SMA
patients the SMN protein is almost completely absent from all cells, for
unknown reasons, alpha motoneurons are most severely affected and die, which
causes the muscular atrophy. The disease can manifest in four phenotypes (type
I to IV) that differ in onset and severity. The phenotypes correlate roughly with
the number of SMN2 copies in the genome, most likely because more SMN2 copies
produce more SMN protein. Since stimulation of SMN2 exon 7
usage would increase SMN protein levels and potentially cure the disease, work
has concentrated on understanding the regulation of exon 7. Typical for the
combinatorial control of exon regulation, multiple factors determine the
regulation, including a suboptimal polypyrimidine tract, a
central tra2-beta1-dependent enhancer and the sequence around the C→T change at
position 6. Recent large scale mutagenesis studies indicate that a composite
regulatory exonic element termed EXINCT (extended inhibitory context) is
responsible for the regulation of exon 7 inclusion . The exon skipping event is caused by the C→T change at
position 6 and currently two models are proposed for its mechanism. In one
model, the base exchange destroys the exonic enhancer that normally binds to
SF2/ASF and in the other model, the mutation
creates an hnRNPA1 binding site that acts as a silencer and . Both models can explain the predominant skipping of exon 7.
Inclusion of exon 7 depends on a central tra2-beta1 enhancer sequence .
Tra2-beta1 is an SR-related protein. Its activity is regulated by
dephosphorylation mediated by protein phosphatase 1 and, not surprisingly, exon
7 usage depends on cellular PP1 activity .
SMN illustrates several common features of diseases caused
by missplicing. Evolutionary changes in the genome, here the recent dublication
of genes that facilitate their recombination, can manifest in splicing changes.
Alternative exons are regulated by numerous factors and sequence elements and a
single mutation can disturb the balance necessary for normal exon recognition.
Finally, splicing factors are regulated by reversible phosphorylation
controlled by cellular signaling pathways.
2.1.2. Tauopathies as an example for a
disease caused by a change in the ratio of protein isoforms generated by
alternative splicing
Tauopathies
describe several diseases of the central nervous system that show intracellular
accumulations of abnormal filaments that contain the microtubule associated
protein tau. The tau protein is encoded by a single gene (MAPT, (microtubule
associated protein tau) located on chromosome 17. The gene undergoes extensive
alternative splicing and eight of the sixteen exons are alternatively spliced.
In humans, these splicing events are spatially and temporally regulated. For
example, exons 2, 3 and 10 are adult specific and show differences in splicing
in various brain regions. The tau protein binds to microtubules via microtubule
repeat regions. One of these microtubule binding regions is encoded by the
alternatively used exon 10. Exon 10 inclusion creates a protein with four
microtubule repeats (4R), whereas exon 10 skipping creates an isoform with
three repeats (3R). This splicing event is species-specific in the adult. In
humans, exon 10 is alternatively spliced in the adult, whereas in mice the exon
is constitutively used. In both species, the exon usage is regulated during development.
Genetic studies
identified rare dominant mutations in the tau gene that caused frontotemporal
dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17), where currently
42 mutations are listed. The majority of the mutations affect the splicing
regulation of exon 10 that encodes part of one microtubule binding site. The
mutations in tau exon 10 helped dissect its regulatory elements. The exon shows
an alternating arrangement of four enhancer and three silencer regions. A
mutation that falls into a silencer or enhancer regions either promotes or
decreases exon usage, respectively. Mutations in exon 10 alter its normal
fraction of inclusion and changes of pre-m-RNA encoding 3R and 4R repeat tau
isoforms were found associated with FTDP-17. These data
clearly suggested that the splicing mutations cause the neuropathology by
changing the ratio between the 3R and 4R isoforms. One mechanistically well
understood mutation is N279K . This mutation is
caused by changing a TAAGAAG into GAAGAAG. The GAAGAAG sequence forms the core
of a tra2-beta1 binding site. Similar to the situation in exon 7 of SMN2, this
mutated version contains two partially overlapping versions of the GAAG binding
site. Biochemical studies showed that the mutation increases affinity to tra2-beta1 in
vitro and cotransfections experiments showed that
tra2-beta1 promoted exon 10 inclusion in reporter gene constructs . In
vitro studies showed that the asparagine to lysine exchange in the mutation
does not alter the binding between tau and tubulin, the tau aggregation or
microtubule assembly. These data suggested that mainly the
change in the ratio of expressed isoforms is responsible for the disease.
Testing this hypothesis in mouse models was difficult, as the mouse tau gene
constitutively expresses the 4R isoform in the adult. Therefore, a minigene of
human tau, containing the promoter and all exons flanked by shortened intronic
regions was expressed in mice. These constructs show alternative splicing
resembling the human situation and express human tau protein containing either
3 or 4 microtubule binding domains. When the mutation that promotes exon 10
inclusion (N279K) was introduced into exon 10 of this construct, pre-m-RNA
splicing was shifted as expected towards exon 10 inclusion. Interestingly, the
mice showed similar pathophysiology as humans with the same mutation and also
showed behavioral changes . These data suggest
that a change in the ratio between 3R and 4R tau isoforms is an important
underlying cause for FTDP-17.
2.1.3. Hutchinson–Gilford progeria
syndrome as an example for a disease caused by an intronic mutation that
activates a cryptic splice site
Hutchinson–Gilford
progeria syndrome (HGPS) is a rare genetic disorder phenotypically
characterized by many features of premature aging. It is clinically
characterized by postnatal growth retardation, midface hypoplasia,
micrognathia, premature atherosclerosis, absence of subcutaneous fat, alopecia
and generalized osteodysplasia. At birth, the appearance of patients is
generally normal, but by one year of age patients show severe growth
retardation, balding and sclerodermatous skin changes. Patients live a median
of 13.4 years and die of heart attacks or congestive heart failure.
Mutations causing HGPS have been identified in the nuclear lamin A/C (LMNA)
gene. Lamin proteins are distributed throughout the nucleoplasm and are
involved in numerous functions, including DNA replication, transcription,
chromatin organization, nuclear positioning and shape, as well as the
assembly/disassembly of the nucleus during cell division. Out of 14 mutations
affecting lamin A/C, three have been reported to specifically alter lamin A
splicing. The changes in splicing lead to the production of truncated protein
products (p.G608G, p.T623S and IVS11+1G>A). Most of the typical
Hutchinson–Gilford progeria cases are due to a recurrent, de
novo point
mutation in LMNA exon
11: c.1824C>T . This mutation occurs in a probable exon splicing enhancer.
As a result, a cryptic splice site is activated in transcripts generated from
the mutated allele, which is located 5 nucleotides upstream of the mutation.
The use of the cryptic splice site leads to the production of a truncated Lamin
A protein lacking the last 150 base pairs of exon 11. The truncated protein is
called “progerin” and acts in a dominant fashion to generate the HGPS
phenotype.
This example shows how a mutation can
cause activation of a nearby otherwise ‘hidden’, cryptic splice site.
2.1.4. LDL
receptor splicing variants caused by a single nucleotide polymorphism are a
sex-specific factor for hypercholesterolemia
Hypercholesterolemia is a major risk
factor for arteriosclerosis. Low-density lipoproteins are removed from the
bloodstream by the LDL receptor (LDLR). Mutations in the LDLR are a primary
cause for hypercholesterolemia. Recently, a single nucleotide polymorphism was
identified in exon 12 of the LDLR that promotes skipping of this exon. The SNP
was found to promote exon 12 skipping in the liver of pre-menopausal women.
However, the SNP had no effect on men and post-menopausal women. The SNP and
the splicing pattern are associated with a higher level of cholesterol in
pre-menopausal women, but not in men. Exon 12 skipping generates a truncated
form of the receptor that lacks the transmembrane domain necessary for membrane
binding and internalization. It is possible that the protein generated by exon
12 skipping prevents, in a dominant negative form, the uptake of LDL. This
model explains the interesting finding that exon 12 skipping caused by this SNP
is associated with cholesterol levels. The reason for the sex-dependency of the
SNP is unclear, but is possible that high estrogen levels influence
transcription level of the gene or its alternative splicing.
This example nicely illustrates that a
SNP can influence alternative splicing, which in turn predisposes to a disease.
Reflecting the combinatorial control of alternative exon regulation, the result
of a mutation depends on other factors, in this case the sex and age.
2.1.5. Familial
dysautonomia as an example for a disease caused by a mutation in the 5′
splice site
About 10% of roughly 80,000 mutations
reported in the human gene mutation database affect splice sites . Well-studied diseases caused by changes in splice site
selection include thalassemias and Familial
dysautonomia (FD). FD, (also Riley–Day syndrome, hereditary sensory and
autonomic neuropathy type III) is a recessive disease that is caused by loss of
function of the i-kappa-B kinase complex associated protein (IKBKAP). In the
Ashkenazi Jewish population, the incidence is 1/3600 in live birth (carrier
frequency
The example of FD illustrates the complexity
of mutations in splice sites that have to be carefully analyzed within the
context of other regulatory elements. It further shows that a missplicing event
of a key regulatory gene can have profound impact by affecting other genes, and
finally indicates that splicing is influenced by small substances.
2.1.6.
Medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency illustrates how multiple
mutations affect exon usage leading to a human disease
Medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase
(MCAD) is a mitochondrial enzyme that participates in the degradation of medium
chain length fatty acids. Deficiencies of this enzyme are the most frequently
diagnosed defect of mitochondrial beta-oxidation. The patients show metabolic
crisis, characterized by hypoglycemia, lethargy and seizures, when first
exposed to viral infections or challenged by fasting. About 20% of the infants
die. MCAD deficiency results in accumulation of medium-chain acylcarnitines in
the urine, which can be analyzed by mass-spectrometry. A large newborn screen
showed an incidence from 1:15,000 in the
This example illustrates the fine-tuned
balance of positive and negative acting factors that exists in splicing
regulation. It also shows that seemingly irrelevant mutations can have an
effect on splicing when they are combined with other mutations. Finally, the
similarities between the regulation of MCAD exon 5 and SMN2 exon 7 suggest that
there are degenerate ‘building blocks’ or ‘regulatory modules’ in the splicing
code.
2.1.7.
Frontotemporal lobar dementias are caused by the loss of the splicing factor
TDP43
TDP43 (TAR DNA binding protein 43 kDa) was originally identified as a transcriptional repressor that associates with the transcriptional activator DNA region (TAR) in HIV and was later also found associated with the spermatid-specific gene SP-10 promoter , reviewed in . TDP43 is a member of the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNP) family of proteins. The protein was later identified as a factor that binds to 12 UG repeats that cause aberrant skipping of exon 9 of the CFTR gene, leading to cystic fibrosis . It contains two RNA binding domains. The first RNA binding domain is necessary and sufficient for binding to RNA that contains at least four UG repeats. In addition, TDP43 shows binding to single stranded TG DNA repeats in vitro . TDP43 is a nuclear protein and it was therefore completely surprising when it was detected in ubiquitin-positive, tau and alpha synuclein-negative cytosolic inclusions that are the characteristic feature of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehring's disease) . During the disease, TDP43 is cleaved